
Intuitively, we say that
if f
is defined near (but not necessarily at) c and f(x) approaches L
as x approaches c.
If we let x approach c from the left side only, we write
since x is approaching c from
smaller values. Similarly, for x approaching c from the right, we
write
. The two-sided
limit
exists if and only if both of
these one-sided limits exist and are equal.
Consider the graph of a function f(x) shown below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More rigorously, let f be defined at all x in an open interval containing c, except possibly at c itself.
Then
Each of the following properties is proven using the rigorous
definition of the limit. Let
stand for
,
, or
. Assume
and
both exist.
, provided
In practice, much of the time we can ``reason out'' the value of a limit without explicitly using the ε-δ definition.
since as x
increases,
even though
is undefined at x=3 since
and
What about something like
? When we cannot easily ``reason out'' the value of a limit, we
can often use numerical methods or L'Hôpital's Rule to determine
the value of the limit. Can you convince yourself that
?
Let the function f be defined at all x in an open interval containing c, except possibly at c itself.
Then