Catalogue Description
The goal of this course is to improve students' ability to communicate mathematics, both to a general and technical audience. Students will present material on assigned topics and have their presentations evaluated by students and faculty. This format simultaneously exposes students to a broad range of topics from modern and classical mathematics.Instructor
Dagan Karp
("firstinitiallastname"@hmc.edu).
Useful Resources
Advice from Joseph GallianTechnically Speaking Videos
Beamer Examples and Guide
Wikipedia Beamer Article
Neil deGrasse Tyson
Grading
Your course grade will be based on your talks, in-class critiques, written peer evaluations, and a class journal. There will be 100 points available, and the breakdown will be as follows.
-
Short Talks: 5 points each (15 points)
Long Talk Pitch: (5 points)
Longer Talk: 10 points (10 points)
Written Peer Evaluations: 5 points each (40 points)
Journal: (30 points)
First day exercises: (5 Points)
Pre-Talk Reflections: 5 points each (20 points)
Reflection: 5 points (5 points)
Audience
Although we may have guests visiting us from time to time, the assumed audience for all of your talks will be your Math Forum classmates. You may therefore assume that your audience is familiar with the HMC core curriculum and Math 55, but you should not assume they are all familiar with all of the content of our upper-division mathematics courses. Also, all talks that use slides may be presented using Beamer. See the resources above for assistance in preparing your talks using Beamer, and don't be shy about asking around about Beamer--many students on campus know it well.
Journal
Create a journal for the course. Here, you will record pre- and post-talk reflection.This document should be a Google doc, named lastname_m198_f20_journal.
Teams, Practicing, Reflecting, and Uploading
Students will work in teams to practice talks and give and receive feedback. It's important that you practice and discuss your talks with your teammates. This will help strengthen your talks before you give them in class. Please keep in mind that you will be evaluated especially on the extent to which your talks are clear and compelling.
For each talk, after you meet as a team, and before 11:00 PM on the day before you speak, please enter a pre-talk reflection in your journal answering (using 1-3 substantial sentences per question) the following two questions:
-
(1) How would you summarize the feedback and advice your teammates
gave you about your practice talk?
(2) After having given your talk to your teammates and hearing their feedback and advice, what goals do you have for your talk?
Furthermore, by 11:00 PM on the day before you speak, please upload your talks to your Math 198-01 Sakai drop box. To help me out, please use the following naming scheme for your files: lastname-talk2.pdf or lastname-talk3.pdf. (For example, I would upload something called karp-talk2.pdf for my second talk, karp-talk3.pdf for my third talk, and so on. Note: There will be no slides for your first talk.)
Peer Evaluations
Step 1
For each round of talks, you will be submitting evaluations
of at least two of your classmate's talks. Please submit your
evaluations by using your section's evaluation Google Doc:
- Organizational structure, flow, intro, conclusion
- Body language, voice inflection, gestures
- Visuals: words, images, use of color
- Clarity of explanations, amount of information, context, background
Step 2
You will receive an automated response receipt from the google form upon submission. Note: Feedback is not anonymous.
Five Point Scale for Five Minute Talks
We will decide a rubric collectively and record the result here. The collective rubric as as follows:
Talks will be awarded one point for each of the following components.
- Prepared for and attended a practice meeting.
- Gave constructive feedback during practice meeting.
- Incorporated feedback from peers into talk.
- Addressed the goals of the assignment in talk.
- Respected the time limit.